My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be, Too

In this moment, there are tears in my eyes.  The woman I have supported for the presidency of the United States since she announced in January 2007 is conceding that she has lost the race for president.  Her speech is gracious, expansive, impassioned.

She is standing with Senator Obama to say, "Yes, we can."

Years ago, Bill Clinton said, "I am a Democrat by history, conviction, and temperament."

I too am a Democrat by history, conviction, and temperament.

Hillary has been my leader for the last 17 months.  She is calling on all of her followers to work hard to make Barack Obama president.  How can any of us who were willing to make her president of the United States let her call to support Barack Obama fall on deaf ears.

We must help elect Barack Obama our president.  This election is a turning point election.  We all must understand what our choice is, shall we go forward, or shall we slip backward.

She has asked much of us, and we have responded to her call each step of the way, no matter how hard it was.  We took days off from work to make calls for her.  We sent money we didn't have.  We endured hostility that raised our blood pressure.  When Hillary calls on us now to embrace our history, our convictions, and our temperaments as Democrats, how shall we fail her in this call she made to us.

Hillary is asking you to be with Barack Obama.  Do not fail her.



Display:


Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (2.00 / 8)

Every moment looking back keeps us from going forward.  I love that line.


by ProfessorReo on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:12:10 PM EST

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (2.00 / 2)

I did too.  I hope both herand Obama's  supporters take it to heart; we all need to let go of the negative stuff said on both sides during the campaign and support our nominee:  Senator Barack Obama.


Capitalization is the difference between "I had to help my uncle Jack off a horse..." and "I had to help my uncle jack off a horse..."
by igottheblues on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:31:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (none / 0)

I think that was my favorite part of the whole speech.  Still I can't help but to look back. :(


by annita on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 08:49:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

ITS HEALTHCARE, STUPID.. (1.60 / 10)

People voted for Hillary because of her position on healthcare. Many people don't have the luxury of ignoring this issue.

If Obama wants their votes, he is going to have to be much more than the lesser of two evils on healthcare.

We aren't stupid. People know about the adverse selection issue. If I were Obama I would ditch his whole healthcare plan and start fresh.

Hillary's plan was a pragmatic reaction to the STRANGLEHOLD the healthcare industry and the insurance industries have on Americans. It would get help to people soon.

I wish I could be more positive about Obama, but until he starts telling people the truth I can't be. I will GLADLY sing his praises when he starts telling people the truth. HE HAS to do this, now, before the election, to do it with integrity. Otherwise, it will seem like he lied to get elected, and then it is the old "sorry, we just dont have the funds" rag..

the "check came back insufficient funds", as it were, as MLK said.


http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Ep isode.aspx?sched=1242
Confused by the 'Bailout' Lies?
Listen to NPR's The Giant Pool of Money
by architek on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:15:58 PM EST

Re: ITS HEALTHCARE, STUPID.. (2.00 / 8)

Yes, I am sure that Senator McCain's health plan would be so much more like Hillary's.

We lost.


That's it, baby; let's go win this election!
by Beltway Dem on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:19:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Another good diary, bd. (none / 0)

The next phase begins.


by ReillyDiefenbach on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 01:54:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Look, if he wants to tell people the truth (2.00 / 1)

and then, see if he still gets elected, then although people like me wont be happy, at least we will not be accusing him of lying. What he needs to do is explain that his healthcare plan is for normal people, people who aren't sick, and that it is too expensive to cover sick people who are not in a plan right now. They will be able to buy the alternative coverage, and the insurance companies will have to quote them a price (when before they would have simply said 'no, we are not interested in your business') So, under under Obama they will be forced to quote them what they consider to be a 'fair price' but that price will be much more than most of them - the ones who aren't wealthy basically - can afford. It will be like the states that basically already do that. Also, many companies probably will stop writing individual policies, as they wont want to be known for charging obscene rates.

The reality is that medical costs are very high. That is largely because of corporate/government policy. We are constantly signing these trade agreements that tie our hands in these matters. For example, that is why buying drugs from overseas pharmacies remains technically illegal. Those companies have intellectual property and they have often paid millions of dollars for the rights to this market. They charge Americans more because the government has been letting them get away with it for a long time. For that reason, many of the proposals being floted by both Obama and McCain to lower healthcare costs are illegal, so they wont be able to be implemented. They are violations of free trade agreements. If Obama went to Americans and said well, NAFTA says that we can't start our own insurance company, or force larger companies to insure their employees because   that is discriminatory and penalizes companies that are more likely to have international investors, or 'we cant try to negotiate down the price of drugs because it is prohibited' etc. WE NEED TO RENEGOTIATE NAFTA and that is going to take years.. we just finished getting them to implement these rules elsewhere, and people died because they could not afford drugs they needed there, so we would look pretty selfish'

then people would understand..

His other alternatve is to force companies toprice insurance


http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Ep isode.aspx?sched=1242
Confused by the 'Bailout' Lies?
Listen to NPR's The Giant Pool of Money
by architek on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:31:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Every improvement (2.00 / 1)

to health care insurance over the last 50 years has been incremental.  If you don't like Obama's and it get passes into law, it will be one step closer to the day we have the system we want.

John McCain is promising that the system will remain unchanged.

Really, I mean, really give it some thought.


That's it, baby; let's go win this election!
by Beltway Dem on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:37:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Every improvement (2.00 / 2)

What improvements have occurred over the last 50 years? Those of us who actually deal with the system know we've only gotten incrementally more screwed as time goes by. Just about every aspect of our health care system is a tragic mess. It's way past the point of incremental. We need sweeping changes on all levels now.


by LakersFan on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:22:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Every improvement (none / 0)

Medicare and Medicaid were passed in 1964 or 1965. SCHIP was passed under the Clinton administration.


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:54:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Every improvement (none / 0)

Great. So it's been only 43 years since we've had an improvement. Doesn't make me feel any better. And in that same 43 years the system has gotten much worse for everyone.

And since Medicare and Medicaid were huge changes, this only underscores my point that our system is beyond incremental help and needs sweeping changes now.


by LakersFan on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 03:26:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Every improvement (none / 0)

SCHIP wasn't passed in the 1960s. It was passed in the 1990s.


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 05:52:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Every improvement (2.00 / 1)

Yeah, I missed the SCHIP point. I'm very glad that someone named Clinton cared about kids enogh to get that through. But uninsured children are not the cause of our nation's health care crisis. While it was the right thing to do, it didn't address the underlying issues at all.


by LakersFan on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 06:14:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The Health Insurance Portability Act (none / 0)

was a step forward.  People who get another health plan within a month of losing their old one can be insured, and an insurance company can't deny them acceptance based on pre-existing conditions.

That passed in 1996.


That's it, baby; let's go win this election!
by Beltway Dem on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 03:06:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Health Insurance Portability Act (none / 0)

HIPPA is great -- if you have insurance to begin with.

OK. You've named one incremental improvement that affects a limited number of people. That's not enough. And since then things have only gotten worse. We need a complete overhaul. Now.


by LakersFan on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 03:31:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I assumed (none / 0)

you had read the comments about Medicaid, Medicare, and SCHIP.  Those are four incremental improvements, and each of them improved the lives of a particular segment of the population.  Yes, it would be great were to go to a single payer universal system in one great leap forward, but John McCain won't move us one inch closer.  I think Obama's plan is flawed because it doesn't spread risk across the entire population, but if we adopted it, the next reform would have to be an inability to opt out, because Obama's plan won't work without that.  It would be one step away from a complete reform.


That's it, baby; let's go win this election!
by Beltway Dem on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 03:49:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I assumed (none / 0)

Most of the problems we have right now are because of our "ability" to "opt out". We have 47 million uninsured people because we're "allowed" to make our own "choices". We need to stop this now. We don't need to wait and figure it out in the future. We already know this is the very root of the problem.


by LakersFan on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 03:59:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yeah, (none / 0)

well, I wish Hillary had won the nomination, but she didn't.  So I am doing the best I can with the result we have.  Wishing it were otherwise, or pretending that the choice between McCain and Obama makes no difference, just doesn't fit my view of reality.  

People need to follow their consciences.  You are certainly are welcome to do what you want, and if lobbying Obama to fix his plan is part of that, I encourage you to do it.  If sitting this one out is the best you can do, I can't change that either.


That's it, baby; let's go win this election!
by Beltway Dem on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 04:10:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yeah, (2.00 / 1)

I'm actively lobbying for Obama to fix his plan. I've never said I wouldn't vote for him.


by LakersFan on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 06:10:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Exactly.. Honesty and Dialogue are the best way.. (2.00 / 2)

Obviously, we have a significantly better chance to negotiate before the election than after it. If either candidate is elected without a dialogue on these issues, it will be at least four, probably eight years before the dialogue begins again. Then we will have the burden of two major defeats behind us. Also, if you red the diary I just posted, there is a huge barrier we will have to overcome, GATT regulations, before we institute any major changes on healthcare that effect international trade (and they all - all the candidates proposals, do) That will add a several year delay while we negotiate our exit from WTO/GATT jurisdiction on healthcare.

Read the diary.


http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Ep isode.aspx?sched=1242
Confused by the 'Bailout' Lies?
Listen to NPR's The Giant Pool of Money
by architek on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 08:12:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Magic and Kareem (none / 0)

will sure as hell be voting for Obama.


by ReillyDiefenbach on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 12:55:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Magic and Kareem (none / 0)

Magic is a major Hillary Clinton endorser, supporter and fundraiser (and my all-time favorite Laker, although Kobe's starting to come close). I don't believe he has endorsed Obama for the GE, but he may.


by LakersFan on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 01:17:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Magic and Kareem (2.00 / 1)

I knew that, but of course he will endorse Obama.  Go Lakers, since Hector was a pup!!!


by ReillyDiefenbach on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 03:20:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Magic and Kareem (none / 0)

Did you read TJ Simers column in the LA Times today? If you haven't read it already, go read it now.


by LakersFan on Mon Jun 09, 2008 at 01:46:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Every improvement (2.00 / 1)

An incremental improvement is just not going to do it anymore.  I don't know how old you are and how healthy you are, but for anyone not blessed with youth and/or good health, and without a corporate or government job, access to insurance is impossible now.  It is an emergency situation.

I'm an Obama supporter but I think he is going to have to, at the very least, advocate for mandates.  My feeling about that is with this sinking economy, that may actually bring forth single-payer much more quickly than you would imagine.


by mady on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 06:43:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The priority seems to always be 'keep the people (none / 0)

who have important jobs healthy' Its called 'triage' and it is practiced in emergency situations when healthcare has to be rationed because of shortages.

Many companies that self insure prioritize current employees to the point of even
going after the lawsuit winnings
of previous employees who have been permanently disabled claiming that they need that money to pay the healthcare costs of current (non-disabled) employees.

That shows where we are going as supply and demand puts downward pressure on wages and benefits.

Many other developed countries have different priorities. Not us.

If you look at Obama's healthcare plan, he clearly has a goal of improving the statistics of 'number of people covered by something' which he achieves by a number of mechanisms. However, this means that many people are exposed to more risk than they should be and also co-pays and uncovered costs are higher under many of the less expensive 'choice' s.

McCain has also taken up the mantra of 'choice'. Its been around for a number of years now.

People are supposed to save the huge amounts of money they are saving by buying these low-cost plans in tax free savings accounts to pay for the inevitable uncovered costs.

Austan Goldsbee, Obama's economics advisor,
claimed that Clinton, also
would not be able to cover that pesky one fifth of Americans with chronic illnesses. Hillary addressed that concern with some papers she published, explaining that the mandate made it possible, and her premium cap, but she lost.


http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Ep isode.aspx?sched=1242
Confused by the 'Bailout' Lies?
Listen to NPR's The Giant Pool of Money
by architek on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 08:24:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: ITS HEALTHCARE, STUPID.. (2.00 / 5)

I think Obama will give Hillary the reigns on healthcare reform.

Here is what he said in his victory speech in Minnesota:

And you can rest assured that when we finally win the battle for universal health care in this country, she (Hillary Clinton) will be central to that victory.


McCain = bad Obama = good
by CAchemist on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:34:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: ITS HEALTHCARE, STUPID.. (2.00 / 1)

I agree.  I think they talked about that in their secret meeting, too.  That would be one of her ultimatums--adopt her healthcare plan as the official party platform for 2008, whether she's on the ticket or not.


Proud member of the Wikipedia Generation of American politics
by BishopRook on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:23:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

A little tip... (none / 0)

DON'T BELIEVE A WORD YOU HEAR FROM POLITICIANS WHERE THINGS LIKE THIS ARE CONCERNED.


http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Ep isode.aspx?sched=1242
Confused by the 'Bailout' Lies?
Listen to NPR's The Giant Pool of Money
by architek on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 08:26:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A little tip... (none / 0)

Good thing a politician didn't tell me that, I was guessing. :P


Proud member of the Wikipedia Generation of American politics
by BishopRook on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 09:24:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: ITS HEALTHCARE, STUPID.. (2.00 / 1)

Mojo'ed for keeping the issue alive and changing your previous tagline. Senator Obama will fight for the Universal healthcare we all so desperately need. I know it. I know how important it is and it's not anything any of my patients or anyone really has the luxury of ignoring. I don't believe that we are fighting Senator Obama. Right now McCain is trying to use the issue to try to restore his pathetic history of really poor fiscal management, something which this country can not tolerate any more years of. He's using the same excuse to deny our veterans and those in the service what should be a right they have earned. I've been to Washington several times to tell both the House and Senate about our needs. Got a lot of doors shut pretty rudely in our faces by some Republicans. Got very supportive and encouraging responses from many Democrats, especially Senators Obama and Clinton. We just need a few more Senate and House members. We need to do that together. It will happen.


John McCain is a liar. Erratic, poor judgment.
by Jeter on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:32:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

McCain would enslave US healthcare to WTO (none / 0)

This looks important!

"
McCain Proposal for National Health Care Market Would Raise Cost of Removing U.S. Health
Care from WTO Jurisdiction

McCain has proposed the development of a "national health care market" that would facilitate entry of
more foreign health care providers and thus make it far more costly for the United States to withdraw
the health care sector from WTO jurisdiction.

While McCain has provided few details about the
proposal, implementing a real national insurance market would inherently require greatly reducing the role of states, for instance with the federal government taking control of licensing and standards now under state authority.

Pre-empting the authority of U.S. states in this area is a key demand of foreign insurance companies in the context of the WTO's Doha Round of negotiations.42 European and other foreign insurance firms have long considered U.S. state-level regulation of the insurance market to be a market access barrier
because it requires that they must obtain licenses in each of the 50 states in order to provide insurance services on a national basis.43

Since the insurance sector and health services are already covered under the GATS, new federal law that would preempt such existing state authority would facilitate the entry
of foreign service-providers into the U.S. market. Once the flood gates are open and many foreign
health insurance and health service providers are in the U.S. market, it would be significantly more
costly for future administrations to remove the health care sector from WTO coverage, as all WTO
nations with firms in the U.S. market or with an interest in the market would have to be compensated
under WTO rules.44
Unless U.S. health care services are withdrawn from coverage under various trade rules, federal
and state governments' future abilities to effectively regulate the delivery of health care services,
implement health care reform measures designed to expand access, and reduce the cost of health
care could be stymied. Because the United States must provide compensation under WTO rules
before removing U.S. health care policy from WTO jurisdiction, quick action to do so will be
much less costly, before more foreign insurance and health care providers enter the U.S. market."


http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Ep isode.aspx?sched=1242
Confused by the 'Bailout' Lies?
Listen to NPR's The Giant Pool of Money
by architek on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 05:36:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Welsh (none / 0)

not welch, unless you meant grape juice.


by ReillyDiefenbach on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 01:00:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: ITS HEALTHCARE, STUPID.. (none / 0)

uprated.

i don't agree with saying that obama is lying, but other than that, genuine disagreements over substantive policy issues seem fair to me.


by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 04:13:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Can you find a single credible source that thinks (none / 0)

that people who don't need insurance will buy in to it on a large enough scale to make it affordable for all? Also, it seems obvious to me that if we dont have that mandate and Obama forces health insurance companies to charge everyone the same age the same (i.e. 'not discriminate' it would raise the cost to everyone who is enrolled by at least 200-300% because the very well to do people with chronic illnesses and the very desperate could then afford insurance, even though it would cost thousands of dollars a month, they could suddenly buy insurance when they could not before. However, the healthy would see their rates increase. This will kill the program. The only way to increase the 'risk pool' to a large enough size so that the price increase caused by insuring sick people is manageable is by mandating that everyone buy it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adverse_sel ection

You can do a simulation using Mathematica Reader to show you this, you don't have to take my word for it.

http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/Advers eSelection/

also here is a good description of adverse selection from The Economist
http://www.economist.com/research/Econom ics/alphabetic.cfm?LETTER=A

(scroll down to 'adverse selection' -)

Look, I don't know what kind of logic you use to make decisions, but I require some kind of basis in fact to make them. I was saying that Obama was lying because he is leaving something VERY important out which ALL credible investigators of this issue, including MOST OF THE OTHER DEVELOPED NATIONS OF THE WORLD, MOST OF WHOM ARE AS SOPHISTICATED ECONOMICALLY AS WE ARE.

By leaving adverse selection out, Obama is saying TO ME that he does not intend to actually implement ANYTHING.

Because this issue will kill it. He has a choice, either mandate, or leave all the sick people out in the cold.

Do the math...


http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Ep isode.aspx?sched=1242
Confused by the 'Bailout' Lies?
Listen to NPR's The Giant Pool of Money
by architek on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 05:52:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Can you find a single credible source that thi (none / 0)

As I've said dozens of times, neither of their plans is very good. You can't get universality with Clinton's plan or Obama's. You need a national health service or single payer.  I think we need a solution that incorporates a move to Medicaid for All by adding groups by age -- perhaps up to 25 and Medicare expanded down to 50. The next reform would go further still.


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 05:55:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Clinton would have given us universality.. (none / 0)

A number of credible healthcare researchers were working with her and they figured that they could peg premiums at 5-10% of income (that is what it costs typically in other developed nations, BTW) and subsidize costs above that. This would require a mandate - it would require insuring everyone, that is the way you get enough healthy people (as defined by people whose raw healthcare costs were typically under $500/yr - say one or two yearly checkups, mammograms, vaccinations, etc.) to balance out the sick ones statistically.

The pandering that Obama did was shameless. Its a baldfaced lie to say that you can eliminate the increased costs for sick people without a mandate to balance them out.


http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Ep isode.aspx?sched=1242
Confused by the 'Bailout' Lies?
Listen to NPR's The Giant Pool of Money
by architek on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 06:00:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I'm sorry for my grammatical errors.. (none / 0)

I am working on that.

Its caused by my illness. Its one of the things I am dealing with. Basically my short term memory is very, very bad.

I forget what I was writing in the middle of it.

Its getting better but that is happening very, very slowly.


http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Ep isode.aspx?sched=1242
Confused by the 'Bailout' Lies?
Listen to NPR's The Giant Pool of Money
by architek on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 05:55:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (2.00 / 7)

I may not have supported her, but tears in my eyes too.  She fought hard and as a woman I'm glad she did.


by Renie on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:18:32 PM EST

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (2.00 / 2)

I haven't been this unhappy with the Democratic nominee since 1972.  I will vote for Obama and I will work for Obama.   But I've got news for any Obama fan who expects me to love Obama:  ain't happening.

 Obama is the far superior choice relative to McCain...doesn't mean I think he's a good choice.  It has nothing to do with issues, where the two are very close.   It has to do with fundamental Obama premises of transformation, unity, and post-partisanship.   It's all bullshit and snake oil.    But compared to McCain....   Shrug.  Easy choice.  


by InigoMontoya on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:27:47 PM EST

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (2.00 / 1)

Hey, hate Obama all you want. I'm pleased that you can dislike him (or that's what I'm assuming) and still vote for him and work for him.

I've decided that the reason I'm a Democrat, even though I often feel like I'm really far to the left of the mainstream views of the party, is because I would never vote Republican, and I think third parties get the candidate least ideologically like them elected. And I don't want that. So Democrat is my only choice, whether I like the candidate or not.


by pomology on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:37:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (2.00 / 1)

And now I'm feeling self-conscious because of the whole "It's the Democratic party, not the Democrat party" thing, so to clarity, in the last sentence I mean, "So THE Democrat is my only choice"


by pomology on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:39:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (2.00 / 1)

From different perspectives, we share a similar pragmatism.


by InigoMontoya on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:43:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

We should stay opened (2.00 / 1)

to being surprised.  


That's it, baby; let's go win this election!
by Beltway Dem on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:44:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (none / 0)

I will vote, but I will not work for him  nor will the Democrats be getting any more of my money.


On the train thanks to HRC...
by BRockNYC on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:05:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (none / 0)

yet your sig line seems to suggest you are rooting for a McCain victory in 08. Maybe you should check out this site:
http://www.hillaryis45.org/

by 2501 on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:18:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (none / 0)

I call it planning ahead.

I'm  not rooting for anyone.  The super delegate nominee will get my vote.


On the train thanks to HRC...
by BRockNYC on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:23:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (none / 0)

what about the elected delegate winner?


by 2501 on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:27:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (none / 0)

doesn't matter who got more elected delegates.  no one got enough elected delegates to secure the nomination.  the super delegates made this choice.  Threats from Rep. Clyburn and Donna Brazile helped, of course.


On the train thanks to HRC...
by BRockNYC on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 04:30:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (none / 0)

The superdelegates were never going to overturn the pledged delegates.  It's too bad that the Clinton campaign kept suggesting they might, but recent reporting demonstrates that they were told that this was highly unlikely but they pursued a 5% strategy for getting the nomination.


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 05:56:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (none / 0)

It was a matter of political will, not rule or law.


On the train thanks to HRC...
by BRockNYC on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 07:13:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (none / 0)

yes, and oddly it was the strategy that Hillary was suggesting for most of the race, because it was clear by the end of February that she would not catch up to Obama in pledged delegates. Hillary was the one who kept saying the superdelegates should overturn the results of the actual primaries.

So I'm really not sure how it's "political will" that the superdelegates actually chose to go along with the delegates that the people elected, rather than reversing that result.


by 2501 on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 11:19:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (none / 0)

This isn't difficult.  Their job was to choose the best nominee and the best potential president, not to follow the elected delegates.  If that were the case there would be no need for their existence.  Get it?  See. Simple.


On the train thanks to HRC...
by BRockNYC on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 01:25:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (2.00 / 4)

If you think it's all bullshit, I'd ask you to look at what Obama has already done in just four days since he became the presumptive nominee.

He has instructed the DNC to stop accepting federal lobbyist and PAC contributions.

He has said that he will allow at least one member of the press into every fundraising event, even "private" ones.

...and just to note, he also backed Joe Lieberman into a corner in the Senate and let him know his days are numbered.

Obama is not just talking about changing the way politics are done, he is putting it into action.


by 2501 on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:17:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (none / 0)

If you think this signifies lasting change as to how policy is made, I have bridge to sell you.  


by InigoMontoya on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:19:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (2.00 / 2)

Where is this bridge?  Does it link two interesting places together?  How much will it cost?


Proud member of the Wikipedia Generation of American politics
by BishopRook on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:25:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (none / 0)

How much does it cost?  It depends...how much do you have and how much credit can you secure?


by InigoMontoya on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:44:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (2.00 / 4)

He is doing as much as he can each step of the way as his ability to move things grows. He ran his own campaign that way, and now he's asking the DNC to do likewise.

He is demonstrating in every way that he can so far that he intends to change things, and he keeps at it. Remember he also introduced legislation to bring more transparency to the earmarking process in the Senate.


by 2501 on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:26:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (2.00 / 2)

Which is about Obama's only accomplishment in the Senate, where he mainly disdained the behind-the-scenes nuts-and-bolts work of building legislation as beneath his dignity.  He's demonstrated a remarkable lack of participation in, and appreciation for, the actual machinery of government.


by InigoMontoya on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:43:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Look up ethics reform (none / 0)

Hillary was against it, Obama was a major player.  It passed.  Impressive, eh?


by ReillyDiefenbach on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 01:07:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Look up ethics reform (none / 0)

No, not really.  From a legislative standpoint and learning how to work the Senate, Obama has been remarkably lazy.  One bill does not a legislative career make.   Except maybe in the Obama echosphere.


by InigoMontoya on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 11:01:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Obama lazy? (none / 0)

You really have taken leave of your senses.


by ReillyDiefenbach on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 11:05:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama lazy? (none / 0)

By all means, show me Obama's long list of legislative accomplishments.   He doesn't like the messing with the actual machinery of government, from subcommittee meetings to negotiating with his fellow Senators.  He prefers grandstanding and making soaring speeches.  Feh.  For all his legislative abilities, he could be named Jack Schitt...except Jasper Fforde has already used the name.

Don't let your love of Obama and immersion in the echosphere interefere with your grip on what facts are. Though I realize that for many, it's impossible to acknowledge Obama has any flaws.


by InigoMontoya on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 11:34:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama lazy? (none / 0)

This is just wall to wall intellectual dishonesty and sore loser yapping.  I'm out.


by ReillyDiefenbach on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 11:40:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (none / 0)

There will be no pleasing you, and that's totally okay.  We don't need you.  The rest of us will do the necessary work to elect the Democrat.  You can enjoy the fruits of our labor in the years to come.


by ReillyDiefenbach on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 01:05:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (none / 0)

And this is an example of some of the arrogance within the Obama echosphere.


by InigoMontoya on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 10:59:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (none / 0)

hilarious!  Again, it is all talk with this guy.  Show me the results.


On the train thanks to HRC...
by BRockNYC on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:26:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (1.50 / 2)

those are actual, concrete changes. they didn't talk about stopping donations from PACs and lobbyists, they already have done it.


by 2501 on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:28:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (2.00 / 1)

And what, exactly, are you expecting to come of that?  World peace?  Health care?  Jobs?


On the train thanks to HRC...
by BRockNYC on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:33:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (2.00 / 3)

eventually, yes

the first step to making the government serve the good of all the people is removing the heavy influence of concentrated wealth on how our policies are made.

in order to actually change things, we first need to be able to elect people to Congress who are not beholden to industry lobbies for their campaign funds, because if GE or Walmart or Kaiser Permanente have helped you get elected, then you are much less likely to pass laws about cutting back on wasteful weapons programs, outsourcing of jobs to China, or for universal health care.

So, the first step down the road to world peace, health care, and yes, better jobs for Americans is to make it easier for people to get into Congress financed by the real people who would benefit from those changes. Once we have cleared that hurdle, then our path to getting those "good people" elected becomes easier, and thus building the majorities that can and will vote for the changes we want to see also becomes easier.

"hope" doesn't mean let's all sing Kumbaya. "hope" means believing that if you keep pushing, and keep taking the small steps while focused on your eventual goal, that you can actually reach that goal.

I'd say it's the kind of cynicism I'm hearing in your posts that has kept us where we are now. "It's too hard, it's all bullshit, why even bother to try?"


by 2501 on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:47:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (2.00 / 1)

A major reason I supported Obama early on was his commitment to accountability and transparency in government (the other reason was his Iraq/Iran stance).

Too bad I was so deluded by his bullshit, eh?

Oh, wait.

http://www.fas.org/sgp/congress/2008/s30 77.pdf

This is the Strengthening Transparency and Accountability in Fdeeral Spending Act of 2008 introduced this week by Obama and Coburn.

Behold leadership.


by randomscientist on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:44:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Absolutely. (2.00 / 6)

We won't fail her.


Even John McCain lusts after teh engels.
by sricki on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:31:11 PM EST

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (2.00 / 3)

Because I am a lifelong Democrat, I'll support Obama.

But if the Democrat-controlled Congress couldn't pass a global warming bill this week, I wonder just how he is going to effect this change he talks so much about.

But here we go, everybody...


by VegMom on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:34:19 PM EST

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (2.00 / 2)

I won't, I can't argue with you on the issue of Congressional ineptitude.

Get the good work done dammit.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:50:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (2.00 / 5)

It didn't pass because it didn't have a veto-proof, filibuster-proof majority supporting it.  We need to get that majority, and a President who won't veto it.


We have nothing to fear but fear itself. And clowns.
by haremoor on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:01:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (none / 0)

If we had a president who was out there every day making the strong case for the legislation, and putting pressure on Congress to pass it, then even some of the Republicans would be voting for it. Since we have a president who not only opposes it, but who threatens his own people with retribution if they vote for it...we get what we have now.

plus, even some Democrats thought the bill was a big mess, for reasons other than the global warming issue itself


by 2501 on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:23:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

reconciliation at dKos (2.00 / 5)

we'd love to have any exiles back at dKos.

it got nasty for awhile, but we have much more in common than we have in differences.

this diary just rocketed to the rec list over there

"Come back Alegre, come back Hillary supporters"
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/6/7/1 11237/0187/272/531613

it may have gotten nasty, but i think we should all be forgiven and absolved, and come together to defeat mccain.

btw, i thought hillary's speech was incredible today.

(from an Obama supporter)


by BLin22 on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:40:25 PM EST

I was over there to recommend (none / 0)

the diary in my alternate guise, DCDemocrat.


That's it, baby; let's go win this election!
by Beltway Dem on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:45:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: reconciliation at dKos (1.00 / 2)

NEVER.  dKos is dead to me, at least, forever.  off the bookmarks, off the feeds.  somethings are simply not forgivable.


On the train thanks to HRC...
by BRockNYC on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:06:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

"dKos is dead to me" (2.00 / 2)


Proud member of the Wikipedia Generation of American politics
by BishopRook on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:34:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: reconciliation at dKos (2.00 / 1)

I have no doubt nyceve was sincere but one only has to look at the comments in the speech threads to see nothing at DK has changed.   Hate still reigns and the orange is still rotten.  


by Tolstoy on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:30:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Just say NO to Kos (2.00 / 1)

First, I'm voting for Obama over McCain hands down. BUT dailykos lost me forever. Oh, and the diary you linked is filled with hate for us, and especially Alegre. It seems the people over there still don't get why we left(or were banned).


by Chelsea in 2020 on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:31:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Just say NO to Kos (2.00 / 1)

there's always bad apples.  i could point to someone here with the sig line "clinton '12" (almost rooting for an obama loss).

it will never be unanimous, but i urge you to look at the rec list right now.  the top three diaries are all praising Sen. Clinton.


by BLin22 on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 03:38:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Just say NO to Kos (2.00 / 1)

The problem is that "bad apples" are the norm there. I read the live speech threads at Kos, and half the comments were slamming Hillary for not kissing enough ass. The comeback Clinton supporters thread was mixed, and filled with insults.

Honestly, Kos isn't a place I would post at anymore. It's one thing to disagree with people, but the personal attacks against Clinton supporters and anyone who dares to question something BO does, is not my cup of tea.


by Chelsea in 2020 on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 04:07:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Just say NO to Kos (none / 0)

Ha! Not rooting for or against the guy. He's got my vote, but that's it.  I can't forgive how they tried to denigrate the Clinton presidency or how the media and the "progressive" blogs sullied themselves in trying to destroy our warrior queen.  She has been there for all of us and yet just two weeks ago some of them/you were so easy to suggest that she wanted the guy assassinated.  Truly disgusting if you ask me.  Unforgivable, indeed. So, take my vote.  I'll keep my money and my love.


On the train thanks to HRC...
by BRockNYC on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 04:23:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Just say NO to Kos (none / 0)

Hey, as long as you vote for him.  I'm satisfied. Careful though, you better not follow the campaign much, because he might do the unthinkable and inspire you...

This Obama supporter appreciates Senator Clinton for everything she's done and will do in the years ahead, and am so gratified that she's going to help us Democrats take back America by electing President Obama.


by Democrat in Chicago on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 05:21:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: reconciliation at dKos (2.00 / 1)

Now that our candidate is dead in the water after months of being unfavorably comapred to Satan, we can come back into open arms.

No thanks!


by mmorang on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 03:09:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

A reminder about health care (2.00 / 6)

As President, Obama will not write the health care plan.  Undoubtedly he will have influence, but if Congress sends him a universal health care bill more like Hillary's or Edwards's plan, do you really think he would veto it?  I sure don't.


by ACrawf2 on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:41:42 PM EST

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (2.00 / 4)

What an awesome speech from Hillary. Despite me being an Obama supporter.. I plan to send her $25 to help with her debts.

Obama couldn't have asked for a more complete endorsement. Today made me feel a lot better about the future of our party...


by Philly Ed on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:42:24 PM EST

From this Obama supporter (2.00 / 4)

I would like to say that her speach was absolutely beautiful.  Being a white male this issue about being the first woman or AA to be President never really reasonated with me, other than acknowledging it to be a matter of fact...I understood today something that I did not before..she continued to fight even against great odds, not for herself, but for women and little girls all over the country...she was setting a precident to end all barriers for women going forward...I sensed that single issue was so very important for her and I believe she succeeded and makes everyone proud for her historic legecy that she set that will long outlive her.


by netgui68 on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 01:46:44 PM EST

Re: My Beloved Hillary is for Obama; You Should Be (2.00 / 2)

Virtual rec, Beltway!  Great diary and best wishes for Hillary, whatever comes next for her.


by jdusek on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:17:11 PM EST

Re: My Beloved Hillary (2.00 / 13)

HIllARY CLINTON knocked it out of the park. What a home run. Absolutely the best speech of the campaign. I am so proud of her and of women and of the next President of the United States, Barack Obama.


by linfar on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:21:26 PM EST

Re: My Beloved Hillary (2.00 / 2)

I'm sure that speech made McSame soil his depends. It was a magnificent speech


by hankg on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:32:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary (2.00 / 2)

Linfar, you have no idea how happy I am to see what you wrote!!  Thanks for supporting Obama.  If you can bring half of the energy to Obama that you did for Clinton, wow, this will be a force to be reckoned with.


Capitalization is the difference between "I had to help my uncle Jack off a horse..." and "I had to help my uncle jack off a horse..."
by igottheblues on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:37:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary (2.00 / 1)

I agree wholeheartedly.  A symbolic rec for your comment, linfar.  


by ProfessorReo on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:54:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary (2.00 / 0)

It was a wonderful speech, hitting all the right notes.  And as an Obama supporter, one could not ask for a more complete, ringing endorsement than that presented by Senator Clinton.

Yes, there have been some sharp debates and bitter disagreements.  Yes, it has been a long, arduous, grueling campaign.  But in spite of what some people (including, sadly, a number at dkos) have said, Hillary Clinton is not a "republican-lite".  She is a Democrat through and through, and her ideals and goals are the same as those shared by other Dems.  Our differences are few, our agreements are many.

I never thought Hillary would "take this to the convention".  She is too devoted to her causes to harm her party for personal spite.  As Democrats, we have much to achieve, and now we start to move forward.

I understand that a number of devoted supporters of Hillary will need some time to accept that, although it was an historic run, her campaign has fallen just short.  That is likely made worse by the fact that she was the frontrunner back in early 2007 and at the time her victory seemed assured.  For at least some of her supporters, it's like seeing a dream you nurtured and which seemed so close to being reality die beofre your eyes.  That takes time to recover from, and even a great speech from Hillary won't be enough to heal those wounds immediately.

But the fact of the matter is that the Obama campaign ran a remarkable race as well, and his nomination is historic in its own right, and on almost all major issues both Barack and Hillary are in agreement.  And after 8 long years of watching our country being methodically destroyed from the inside out by ideologues, we have the opportunity to get back on the right track.

This is our time.  This is our opportunity.  For the first time on over 30 years, government will not be demonized and treated as the problem rather than part of the solution.  

Together, we can make this country better, we can undo the damage of the last 8 years and rebuild our nation here and our standing throughout the world.  We can reverse the decline in median income and strengthen the middle class.

So, to all Hillary supporters, take your time, catch your breath, reflect on the successes of your candidate, and continue to advocate for your causes.  We'll be waiting to take you in with open arms, because your goals are ours.

And they most definitely are NOT John McCain's.


by synchronicity on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 05:28:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Beloved Hillary (2.00 / 3)

Linfar,

as much as I loved your diaries, I'd just as much like it if you kept you mouth shut for a while while everyone is trying to deal with this situation.

If you can flip-flot from being passionately for one candidate to being passionate to the opposition candidate within 24 hours, that's just great - for you - but not for the rest of us who are a bit more dedicated than switching on a dime.


It does not take many words to tell the truth Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
by Gabriele Droz on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 07:03:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

When the dime (none / 0)

is our candidate's own advice, I would say that's dedication alright.


That's it, baby; let's go win this election!
by Beltway Dem on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 08:26:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

You Should take your time. (2.00 / 2)

I really think people need time to heal, and not be pushed into supporting anyone right now.  The overly emotional appeals are a turnoff to me and don't seem natural coming from people who have deeply supported Hillary. There is a lot of time left to come around to supporting Obama, or not, and today isn't the day to push it or rub it in people's faces. Human beings aren't made like that, and if something is forced it is more harmful than not. IMHO.


by Scotch on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 02:36:46 PM EST

Well, Hopscotch (2.00 / 1)

I have been pleading with people to give Clinton people some time to work through their emotions.  I frankly have my own feelings of disappointment and frustration, but there is a job to be done, and we need to put our enmity with Obama people behind us.   Things like this require work.  We change our feeling by acting our way into them.

I also am very pragmatic.  I recognized a couple of months ago that our dream was not going to happen.  I thought a note of unreality was creeping into much of what my fellow Clintonistas were saying and doing.

I probably have come farther in my grieving process, because I allowed it to start sooner.  If the race were starting again fresh today, I still would be with Hillary.  But the fact of the matter is that Hillary is not in this race.  It is between McCain and Obama now.  No one else is going to be elected president save one of these two men.  That is the choice.


That's it, baby; let's go win this election!
by Beltway Dem on Sat Jun 07, 2008 at 03:14:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Well, Hopscotch (2.00 / 1)

Well DC Democrat,

I can inform you that your prophecy of Alegre being busy composing her first pro-Obama diary is, ahem, a bit questionable at this point.

But thanks for the false prediction.


It does not take many words to tell the truth Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
by Gabriele Droz on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 04:10:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Well, Hopscotch (none / 0)

yeah, I don't see it happening and I am not sure why people need Alegre to do so.  Can't everyone think for themselves?


by Teacher1956 on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 05:10:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

It's odd. (2.00 / 0)

When I meant Alegre at headquarters, she tried to convince me to go with Obama if we lost the nomination.  I was intransigent that I wouldn't, but she was trying to convince me it was a virtue to elect a Democrat.  

Gabriele, my credentials as a Hillary supporter are elegant.  I well may have been the only recognizable blogger on the World Wide Web who stood with Hillary for the first three months of her campaign.  Do you know what that was like?  Not even Alegre had the courage in those first months to raise her hand.  No, I did my part, and I was never afraid.  So here I am again, doing the unacceptable by leading the way to our nominee.  It's okay.  I like breaking new ground.  Most of you will come around soon or later, and if you don't, people always will ignore or blame you in the future.

You all are beating your heads against a wall.  I hope it doesn't hurt too much.  There is no way to make Hillary the nominee if even Hillary is working for Obama.


That's it, baby; let's go win this election!
by Beltway Dem on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 06:32:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

meant = met (none / 0)


That's it, baby; let's go win this election!
by Beltway Dem on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 06:32:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It's odd. (2.00 / 1)

Sorry Mike,

I don't buy it.

"I well may have been the only recognizable blogger on the World Wide Web who stood with Hillary for the first three months of her campaign."

Never heard of you before you joined the Hillary campaign, and I've been following the blogosphere closely for the past 4 years.

"You all are beating your heads against a wall..."

Perhaps so, but it's time to do so.  The corruption of the DNC reeks, and you know it.

"Gabriele, my credentials as a Hillary supporter are elegant."

ELEGANT?

"doing the unacceptable by leading the way to our nominee."

Go for it Mike, but you'll never have my respect for doing that.  The Democratic Party is beyond self-repair, and you're NOT doing anything about it.  You're just falling in line.

That's all I have to say.  No more responses from me.  Take care, and good luck to you.


It does not take many words to tell the truth Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
by Gabriele Droz on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 06:47:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It's odd. (none / 0)

Just one more thing Mike,

You may have stood with Hillary during the first three months.  But Alegre and others like me are sticking with her through thick and thin.  THAT's the difference.


It does not take many words to tell the truth Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
by